|
Type
|
Definition
|
Reason
|
|
Transivity
|
If A=B and
B=C, then A=C
|
If Bigfoot
walks on two legs and the giant shadowy figure walked on two legs, then the
giant shadowy figure must be Bigfoot.
|
|
Comparison
|
Two things
are examined as if their similarities and differences were measurable.
|
Bigfoot and
Bears
|
|
Single
|
One event is
an example.
|
He argues
that this event is absolute proof that Bigfoot was there.
|
|
Quantitative
|
hey interlink
numerically. Ex: A man is stronger because he lifts heavier weight
|
This dude is ex-military
AND police, AND other things that he lifts off, so he’s more certifiably
sound than anyone else.
|
|
Supposed
|
Probable
data.
|
He allegedly
knows how bears work and how Bigfoot works
|
Friday, February 28, 2020
Bigfoot P-OT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think you found some good fallacies and arguments. You even gave me some ideas I could even use for my Bigfoot post! I think the idea of bandwagon is a really interesting one because the whole is really based off of the idea that it is a big community of people who all believe in Bigfoot. Something you could look at if you wanted was at the very end of the post in the reflection part they said "I found this witness to be truthful and credible." I feel like this could be another appeal to authority or another fallacy that you could work with if you wanted.
ReplyDelete