Introduction
- · Naturalism and joke of the ad
- · Toy is gender neutral
- · Rhetorical Devices used
Point 1
- · The ad is highly naturalistic
- · Uses a real little boy and girl in the ad
- · Is meant to be a parody of an actual car ad
Point 2
- · The ad uses a boy and girl so is meant to appeal to all children
- · The structure of the ad is to focus only on the toy and not on the children
Point 3
- · Rhetorical Devices used throughout the ad
- · The toy takes up the vast majority of ad space
- · The slogan is a play on words
- · The children are dressed as scientists to add to credibility
Conclusion
- · Was this ad effective?
- · Do you want to purchase this toy?
I understand all the points being made, and the argument seems to me that the ad is gender-neutral. Is this the entirity of the argument, or have I missed some of it? Although I'm not working with the ad, I'm a little confused as to what exactly is being argued here. Again, the content and breakdown is great, but the conclusion makes it confusing and there seems to be lack of a general argument. Personally, I like to mark out where to connect parts of my speech to remind myself but that's personal preference. Just tweak it a little and make sure it doesn't go too long, you have a fair amount of info. Good luck!
ReplyDeleteI think it may be helpful structurally to have a more clear main point for each and then break it down from there, for I feel like I am no able to follow you as closely through your argument as you has intended for us. I think the conclusion would serve better, maybe, as a "so what?" question rather than if we want to purchase the toy or if the ad was effective. But good framework!
ReplyDeleteI think overall this is a pretty good outline. I think you need to be a little more clear towards the end as making your last points into questions isn't quite as good as outright writing what you are going to say. Other than that I think you should be good to go.
ReplyDeleteThe only thing I would suggest is to dig a little deeper for an overall thesis, maybe on ideology being portrayed, then tie it into the conclusion. Other than that it looks great!
ReplyDelete