Links to rhetorical tools:

Here are links to the rhetorical tools used in this class:

Schemes & Tropes -- Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca -- Fallacies -- Burke -- Rhetorical Toolbox -- Conspiracy Rhetorics

Friday, February 9, 2018

Another Day Another White Man

The rhetoric present in articles about abuse against women is always interesting. It is either trying to justify it, stay on the fence, or is having to explain why this abuse is wrong or why it not being discussed, because we obviously still don't know how or why it is wrong. This article is about John Kelly. Another worm that has a high position in one of the most powerful houses in the country. Cool. Love that.

1. I feel like the term of equivocation can be exemplified in this line:

"First comes the fairytale. Victims fall in love with the charming side of the abuser, a public persona." (Steiner, Why men like John Kelly do nothing when abuse allegations surface, CNN). 

It feels romanticized. While it is accurate, it feels fluffy and so typical. It loses a lot of relaisticand rhetorical weight. What fairytale? Do they all look the same? What is it supposed to look like? Etc.



2. The title seems a little weird to me too. 

"Why men like John Kelly do nothing when abuse allegations surface"

Like...of course they do nothing? They don't have to. They live in a world where abuse is brushed under the rug and it is only when "snowflakes" find the information is it a big deal. I don't like that this makes the article seem like it is being made about him. I understand the angle that the author is trying to take, which is to explain the hows and whys of abuse cycles, but I feel like the title is a fallacy somehow. 




3. Then we maybe have a quote out of context

"Relationship abuse thrives when otherwise intelligent, powerful people ignore its warning signs." (Steiner, Why men like John Kelly do nothing when abuse allegations surface, CNN). 


The author is not really making it clear as to whether or not she is outlining just this case or if she is outlining every abuse case ever. For if she is outlining every abuse case ever, then she is glossing over so many individual instances where this sparkling term of "intelligent, powerful people" is weird and doesn't exactly fit for different reasons. She is cutting off a lot of her audience. 

No comments:

Post a Comment