This blog will be filled with data analysis samples created by students in my COMM 274 class at TLU. You will see a variety of types of rhetorical analysis methods on display here.
Links to rhetorical tools:
Here are links to the rhetorical tools used in this class:
I think you have a great start here, you can provide the argument that because the argument provides that Sasquatch has evidence of existence and there is enough media coverage of Lochness then there is proof of existence of such a creature. The fact that you have so much ‘evidence’ of Misleading Authority should be one area you focus on in your argument. You should probably lean on Bandwagon because it piggy backs on Misleading Authority. As far as Perelman, Presumption would fit with the fallacies because they are all implying the agreement that these creatures are real.
I think you have a great start here, you can provide the argument that because the argument provides that Sasquatch has evidence of existence and there is enough media coverage of Lochness then there is proof of existence of such a creature. The fact that you have so much ‘evidence’ of Misleading Authority should be one area you focus on in your argument. You should probably lean on Bandwagon because it piggy backs on Misleading Authority. As far as Perelman, Presumption would fit with the fallacies because they are all implying the agreement that these creatures are real.
ReplyDelete