Introduction:
-
Hook
Ø
Ghosts are real, obviously. The footsteps,
particles of dust going into the camera, and words coming through a tiny box
with a million other sounds. But they are only real if you can experience
something paranormal, especially if you don’t have other outside factors.
-
Thesis
Ø
They are creating a story about how they did not
get a lot of evidence so that the audience will feel bad for them. They believe
stories from other experiences and because they were tired, and didn’t have all
of their equipment, they did not get as much evidence to prove these
experiences. They are using emotional manipulation to make the audience believe
this place is haunted.
-
Credibility
Ø
Being in Vroomans rhetoric class, use of his
charts.
Ø
My name, being an English major.
Body:
-
Go through the website and explain what they are
saying.
-
Fallacies Chart:
Ø
We see different types of fallacies being used
within this paranormal investigation. Including- (insert analysis of fallacies
chart here. Printing out the chart so I can say definition and example)
Transition
-
P-OT Chart
Ø
Within the P-OT chart, I found a few more
examples than the other fallacies chart. (Insert analysis of P-OT chart here.
Printing out the chart so I can say definitions and examples)
Conclusion:
-
From this paranormal analysis of Rolling Hill’s
asylum, we can conclude that there is some paranormal activity here based on
the building’s history. But, because of the lack of evidence that the team
presented, we can infer that the building is not as haunted as they make it
seem, and regardless of the reasons why they did not get the evidence they
wanted, there should have been more paranormal experiences.
No comments:
Post a Comment