|
Category
|
Definition
|
Example
from the Text
|
Why?
|
|
Premises
– presumptions/normal
|
Based on a
reference group or experience.
|
‘Cal-Para Research is a paranormal research group based
in southern California. We offer FREE consulting and ghost/spirit
investigations to help you determine if your location has supernatural
activity’
|
This site
is the group or place that you would use for any ghost or weird activity in
your home.
|
|
Premise
Modifiers – Presence – repetition
|
Saying
over and over again
|
This site
continues to stress that there services are free for everyone.
|
This is
so that no one thinks that it is a scam so that people know there not in it
to make money.
|
|
Arguments
sacrifice
|
Is a result worth
some loss?
|
We’re looking to help homes and businesses increase
knowledge and awareness while we explore the Inland Empire and Southern
California.
|
Is the
risk of finding something out worth the risk of having this group come?
|
This blog will be filled with data analysis samples created by students in my COMM 274 class at TLU. You will see a variety of types of rhetorical analysis methods on display here.
Links to rhetorical tools:
Here are links to the rhetorical tools used in this class:
Tuesday, February 27, 2018
Long Island PI: Arguments
Premise Modifier-Presence (Historical):
"The original use of Fort Totten was to protect the East River approach to New York City. Much of the property is now a park and still houses facilities of the U.S. Coast Guard, National Guard, U.S. Army and the NYC Fire Department Training Academy. "
They introduce thier case with substantial historical background as if to emphasize the importance of its history and provide significance to the case.
Succession:
"His audio recorder was on the entire time. As he sat there he started to hear male voices, so he began to do an EVP session. He sat by himself for about 15-20 minutes." He heard male voices SO he tested for EVP.
Prestige:
"One of the residence believes the spirit of the grandfather may be in the house as he was very close to the younger son who has disabilities." Grandfather was close to the younger son, therefore he must be in the house.
Normative:
"Our K2 meters picked up some sporadic results. However the amount of loose wiring and open electrical systems in the theater due to the repair work probably accounted for the readings. None of our other EMF meters had any paranormal readings." Pointing out a potential issue but then qualifying it by what it should mean due to context.
Prestige:
"Empathic Report from Empathic Specialist Peter Ferraro" -Used to emphasize the validity of the report.
"The original use of Fort Totten was to protect the East River approach to New York City. Much of the property is now a park and still houses facilities of the U.S. Coast Guard, National Guard, U.S. Army and the NYC Fire Department Training Academy. "
They introduce thier case with substantial historical background as if to emphasize the importance of its history and provide significance to the case.
Succession:
"His audio recorder was on the entire time. As he sat there he started to hear male voices, so he began to do an EVP session. He sat by himself for about 15-20 minutes." He heard male voices SO he tested for EVP.
Prestige:
"One of the residence believes the spirit of the grandfather may be in the house as he was very close to the younger son who has disabilities." Grandfather was close to the younger son, therefore he must be in the house.
Normative:
"Our K2 meters picked up some sporadic results. However the amount of loose wiring and open electrical systems in the theater due to the repair work probably accounted for the readings. None of our other EMF meters had any paranormal readings." Pointing out a potential issue but then qualifying it by what it should mean due to context.
Prestige:
"Empathic Report from Empathic Specialist Peter Ferraro" -Used to emphasize the validity of the report.
Ghosts of Louisiana Perelman
Ghost
Website Perelman-http://www.ghostsoflouisiana.com/
Facts/Truths:
The website uses the facts/truths premise when it comes to describing the
evidence found. Some of the evidence is “concrete” (most of it is just
probable).
Loci
(Quality): The better the photo, video, or EVP,
the more true it is that ghosts exist and are present.
Succession
(Propagation): The website uses this mostly when it
comes to talking about their more negative hauntings and demons.
Example:
In one of the videos, they explain that if something is done a right way, then
the ghosts will respond.
California Hauntings Perelman
Example
|
Perelman
|
Explanation
|
Stating the investigations of ghosts and that they may exist several times
|
Repetition
|
Trying to embed argument by repeating themselves over and over in order to get the audience to start to think about it more
|
“God created angels and angels are just manifested as ghosts”
|
Structure of Reality - Double Hierarchy
Qualitative
|
Arguing that because God made angels there must be ghost, insinuating that there is a clear connection with lack of evidence
|
“Activity was encountered in the main stage
area, the smaller Stage Two, and the costume shop
area… as well as curious noises and unexplainable
doors closing around the technical areas.”
|
Presence - Time/Space
|
They make the idea of activity feel urgent despite the fact that it could be nothing, but it leads the audience to believe that it could also be something
|
Eclipse Paranormal Arguments
Mikhayla Evans
Perelman Arguments for Eclipse Paranormal
|
Category
|
Definition
|
Example from the Text
|
Why?
|
|
Premises – Facts/Truths- Observed
|
Concrete Data
|
“Her interests in the paranormal began when she was 5
years old after she had an experience with her grandfather who had passed one
week before.”
|
She is basing her existence of the paranormal from
concrete data she experienced in her childhood.
|
|
Premise Modifiers – Presence - Amplification
|
Divide whole into parts
|
“E.P.R.I. is a non-profit organization dedicated to the
study and research of paranormal occurrences. Through research,
investigations, and the documentation of evidence, we seek to broaden our
knowledge and understanding of these unexplained events.”
|
They are dividing
their organization into different parts to show they cover a wide variety of
areas to give them more credibility. If they show what they do in detail then
people will think they are more credible.
|
|
Contradiction
|
Logical incompatibility of propositions
|
“There's a bit more to this story and it really helped to
solidify this strange experience for us, though we don't have proof, so take
it however want.”
|
They contradict themselves by saying it solidified the experience
for them, however they say they don’t have proof.
|
|
Exception
|
Act is especially unique
|
“While on the tour, we decided to keep our recorders
going on our phones because we were on vacation, and we had none of our gear
with us.”
|
They make it seem
like ghosts are real because they weren’t even trying to capture evidence and
they did. So it is an exception in the way of how they weren’t using their
gear to capture anything, but they just happened to capture yells and stuff.
|
|
Premise Modifiers – Presence – Space
|
Making it feel close
|
At one point, the guide was telling us a story about a
fire that broke out in an old building back in 1931. It was late, around
9:30pm, and the streets were completely abandoned at this time, except for
our group.”
|
They make it feel
close in the way they are describing the scene and laying it out. It makes
you imagine the space in your mind making it feel close to you.
|
Lone Star Spirits Arguments
Page:http://www.lsspi.org/blog/
Values-Specific
Example: Pictures
They devote so much effort towards all of this, but they
don’t say it is true, so it is obviously true for them, but they are okay with
us having our own opinion.
Enthymeme-
“David witnessed a piece of dinnerware slide from the back
of the cupboard, over the lip, and on to the counter. We were not able to
verify that the cabinet was properly leveled, however it would have to have
been severely off-kilter for the dish to slide past the lip, and it did not
appear to be so severely slanted.”
In the blog there are mostly premises stated and not too
many claims made about ghosts.
Retort-
Did they really experience stuff from other than
this world, ghosts are never mentioned.
“By the end of the tour, they were pretty sure, that
something was there, watching them. By morning, we all had experienced
something not of this world, photos, videos and tapes are still being reviewed.”
Unlimited Development-
“Pete Haviland, Nichole Dobrowolski and Katie Phillips
spotted it immediatly. Pete made eye-contact with it and felt a sharp pain in
the back of his neck. He, Nichole and Katie immediately left the area. By the
time they had reached the street Pete was doubled-over in pain. We left soon
afterwards. Pete’s photographs revealed 2 hazy black figures, and they would be
posted here but they don’t scan well. He nicknamed them Bob Duckandcover and
Bob Jr.”
Evidence is just stacked and doesn’t really prove anything.
Division -
Posts are separate from each other.
Example-Single
“Spring began in the late 1800s as a railroad town. The
depot that was once there is gone, but the tracks are still in use. During the
70s the Spring Cafe began serving hamburgers that drew people from Houston and
points farther away. Before too long, an enterprising young person got the
bright idea to open a gift shop next door to give people something to do during
their 1 hour+ wait.”
There are multiple single examples on the ghost blog and
tell separate stories of possible ghost sightings.
Perelmans Rhetoric Of Argument
http://pchparanormal.net/
|
Values
|
|
Agreed
upon guides to actions
|
“We
DO NOT practice any form of religious ceremonies, perform séances, use
psychics or mediums.”
|
They
don’t do anything religious when it comes to paranormal activities. Instead,
they stick to their scientific reasoning and use science.
|
|
Presence
|
Space
|
Making
it feel close
|
“A
mysterious hand print appeared on the Flir. During a ECHOVOX session. Jen
pictured here sensed something touch her during the session.”
|
Here,
they wrote about one of their cases and how one of their clients appeared to
have been touched. This would be an example of making it feel close.
|
|
Illustration
|
Clarity
|
Event
makes a rule clearer
|
“Intelligent
haunting are when it seems that the spirit is aware of its surroundings.
These spirits often move small objects, try to talk, touch you, etc.
Basically, their main purpose is to try and communicate with you.”
|
Here
it clarifies how “intelligent ghosts” are. It talks about how they are aware
of their surroundings and move little objects. It later goes on to say they
are basically trying to communicate with you.
|
Houston, TX paranormal investigation team- Perelman analysis
|
Import
Establishing structure of reality
“We do not want to go into an investigation with any preconceived
notions.”
|
The possible event that the crew intends to endeavor towards calls
upon the specific moral value that they intend to stand upon when in their
actions.
|
|
Illustration
Establishing structure of reality
Video footage
|
The video content that is given from the first page of the site gives
adherence to what exactly the group is intending to reveal their essence as a
whole to the audience of the site.
|
|
Homogenous
Premises
“We have been to various types of sites including; residential, some
well known and not so well known abandoned locations, and an assortment of
graveyards and battlefields.”
|
The more of the specific variable in this case is better. As the
group is attempting to appeal to as many individuals as possible by
advocating their methods into fitting of any given type of venue or specific
site.
|
|
Philosophical
Argument types
“…that you have to possess an open mind when searching for answers
regarding the paranormal.”
|
The reduction of definitions are compelled over through this crew
member’s ability to allocate exactly how his experiences are best fit when at
a state of efficiency.
|
Windy City Paranormal
Windy City Paranormal: Perelman
Thesis: Our company knows that ghosts probably
aren’t real, but we will hunt them for you anyway because it’s cool to believe
that they do exist.
Premises:
Facts/Truths
Supposed
Probable Data- They state that they come to investigate the “alleged cases of
paranormal or unexplained activity”. They also say that they will investigate
whether it’s from “natural causes or it is truly paranormal.”. This is saying
that there is not real proof that there are ghosts, but they will investigate
just incase they find something awesome.
Premise Modifiers:
Presence
Repetition-
All throughout the home page it repeats a lot about putting the clients mind at
ease about things that MIGHT be paranormal activity. It says it in six different
ways just on the home page that the cases seem to have natural causes before
any alleged paranormal activity.
Quasi-logical Arguments:
Autophagia
Retort-
They claim to be paranormal investigators… but right there on the home page it
says “taking information from the legitimate investigators that have gone
before us in this field”. They know they aren’t “legit” and are stating they aren’t
right up front. They want to be professional, but they are not doing a very
good job at it.
Premises:
Facts/truths
Supposed.
Probable Data- All of their data is probable data. It is paranormal things,
none of this is concrete. Even they state that it is not an exact science.
Everything is based off of things that might be happening, even if it is “caught”
on a recording or in a video. Any number of things could have caused sounds and
movement, but it’s just fun to that that it was from paranormal things.
Premise Modifiers:
Presence
Time: making
it feel urgent- I feel that all of the things they have recorded and are presenting
as probable data is presenting a sense of urgency. Keeping you on edge of what
you’re going to see or hear. And it makes you want to watch/listen to all of them.
Interpretation
Interpretive
Schemes- I think this is a good example of
this modifier. They really do limit the room for interpretation in the evidence
presented. Its all weird sounds and things moving in recorded content. So it’s
either natural, or paranormal, and the fact that they want you to believe that
it is paranormal makes it all the more relevant.
Establishing the Structure of Reality:
Example
Single-
in the recordings presented as evidence, a single noise is said to be useful
enough to prove true that there is indeed paranormal activity. Such as the man’s
cough in the recording where there are only women present. That cough could have
been anyone’s. Or buzzing in an old building. Ever think about bugs? Or a noise
coming from outside or down the hall?
PCH Paranormal
|
Appeal to Authority:
“Our
intentions are to deliver our clients the truth without filter.”
|
The
author is trying to tell you that they will give you the straight truth. They
don’t say that they’ll give it to you with any explanation whatsoever.
|
|
Accent:
“We
enter all locations with skeptical minds to try and answer or disprove a
claim of a ghost or haunting before we EVER state that it could be something
paranormal.”
|
I
this quote, the word “EVER” is being emphasized to make sure they never think
of there being anything paranormal in the first place.
|
|
Hasty Generalization:
“Members
of this team have all had their own personal experiences with the paranormal.
From childhood to recent encounters, we all have had things happen to us
whether it was physically, verbally, or emotionally that we could not explain.”
|
In
this quote, it talks about the members of this team having their own
paranormal experiences but with no evidence. By this, I mean no actual
stories of their experiences have been told.
|
|
http://pchparanormal.net/about-us/
|
|
Paranormal Investigation of NYC: Perelam
Paranormal
Investigation of NYC
Perelman’s Rhetoric of Argument
|
Premises
|
Presumptions:
The normal
|
Based on a reference group or experience
|
“Never believe what you see on television about paranormal activity,
most of it is made up for entertainment purposes. True activity is rare and
subtle and make take years and many investigations to ever witness.”
|
Don’t believe what tv portrays as ghost hunting, we do the real ghost
hunting and we are credible because we have proof from our personal
experiences.
|
|
|
Value:
Universal
|
Not specific: “truth” “justice”
|
“Remember, when trying to contact the spirit world, there may be no
right or wrong way.”
|
There is no universal rule to follow to contact ghost.
|
|
|
Loci
|
The rare and unique is better
|
“True activity is rare and subtle and make take years and many
investigations to ever witness.”
|
Because paranormal activity is so rare it makes it even better when
captured.
|
|
Premise Modifiers
|
Enthymeme
|
Giving only premises and not the claim
|
“Ghost Hunting & Paranormal Investigation is part Science,
Parapsychology and metaphysics. Remember that proof is only through
observation and belief.”
|
There not many claims made but all of the premises implicitly conclude
that ghost are real.
|
|
Argument types
|
Quasi-logical arguments:
Contradiction
|
Logical incompatibility of prepositions.
|
“First off, I do not consider us Ghost Hunters… Anyway, this is the
info on Ghost hunting...”
|
The first paragraph under ghost hunting explains how they would
rather be called “Paranormal Investigator” but then refer to themselves as
ghost hunter… very contradicting
|
|
Based on the Structure of Reality
|
Symbolic Liasons:
Double Hierarchy
|
Two hierarchies so closely related that one can cue the other.
|
“Contacting the spirit involves prayer and guidance. A spirit will
usually only react to the religion it followed in life”
|
Connecting to God will connect you with the spirts.
|
|
Establishing the Structure of Reality
|
Example
|
Event/s reveal/s a rule or reality.
|
“What you are about to listen to is unedited or not in anyway
enhanced… Listen closely, after I ask "Would you like us to help
you."”
|
Examples are given with evidence of footage as their proof to show
their credibility.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)