Perelman
Argument
|
Article
Connections
|
Facts/Truth – Supposed
|
By using newspaper articles
and police reports, it is assumed that Scarsi believes these
accounts to be the truth when in reality, they are assumptions of
the actual events based on fabrications of the mind and
excitement of the media.
|
Locus of Quantity |
There are more incidents that
allow the connection between Ripper and Szemeredy than those of
quality which would suggest that there are too many coincidences.
|
Presence – Aggregation |
The many different anecdotes
all are to be assumed that they add up to make up the whole.
|
Analysis – Philosophical
|
All of the reasons behind why
Szemeredy is the Ripper are based on the supposed facts of the
media and the police reports.
|
Inclusion |
Each report is a testament to
the larger idea of Szemeredy's guilt.
|
Coexistence – Intention |
Scarsi assumed that all the
reports about Szemeredy make up his entire character as staed in
the section “What have we got here?” |
This blog will be filled with data analysis samples created by students in my COMM 274 class at TLU. You will see a variety of types of rhetorical analysis methods on display here.
Links to rhetorical tools:
Here are links to the rhetorical tools used in this class:
Sunday, February 22, 2015
Szemeredy - Perelman Arguments
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI don't know what happened to my comment but I will type it again!! I enjoyed your analysis and what you talked about Szemeredy and the Ripper but you might want to consider a little about the connection between this two and the evidence that it could be Szemeredy as Jack the Ripper.
DeleteYour analysis of each type of argument is really thorough and precise, but I agree with the above person that you should work harder to try and focus more on the connections between the two.
ReplyDelete