Presumption
|
Although there is no
evidences showing that Jack the Ripper is a women, there are witness of the
night showing how Ripper was running away from the crime scene with women’s
clothing.
|
|
Presumption
|
There are also the possibility
that the suspect is Mary Pearcey because of her conviction of killing her
lover’s wife after the Ripper murders and leaving the same MO at the crime
scene.
|
|
Facts/Truth(Observed)
|
DNA testing shows how
testing an old hair particle can still obtain profiles from hair DNA and
still find the results of which the DNA belongs to from 106 years ago.
|
|
Presumption
|
There were multiple suspects
of Jack the Ripper and the including a “phoney doctor, a real doctor, famous
author, and articles and a royal family member.” Audience might want to
consider all the possible that it could be any of this people.
|
|
Hierarchies
|
Although Jack the
Ripper got its name from publicity it was still gained and ordering value to it
when it was the murders and the how people reacted to the murders, Then when the
murders happen it was the newspaper that gave it the news cover that they
gave to the public. Then it was the public that gave the name of bogey man.
|
|
Succession
|
Because all the
murders are happening and witnesses seeing a person, wearing women is
clothing leaving evidence in the crime scene shows how the suspect could possibly
be a women.
|
This blog will be filled with data analysis samples created by students in my COMM 274 class at TLU. You will see a variety of types of rhetorical analysis methods on display here.
Links to rhetorical tools:
Here are links to the rhetorical tools used in this class:
Sunday, February 22, 2015
Samantha Lopez-Mary Jack the Ripper
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment