Hope Ranch Poltergeist
Kronk- represents the forms of rhetoric that contribute to
the overall persuasiveness of the story.
Good arguments
and claims
Yzma- represents the forms of rhetoric that detract from the
overall persuasiveness of the story.
Bad arguments
and claims
T
X- Yzma
Misleading
vividness- an example of this from the story would be the overall vividness of
descriptions of the house, the weather, the things in the house and not the
vividness of the poltergeist or situation in the home.
Appeal
to misleading authority- “But Mrs. B_____ was adamant that I drop what I was
doing and come at once.” We don’t know who Mrs. B is, there is no mention of
credibility to back up the authority she is given in the story.
Post
hoc- the fallacy of attributing a causal relationship between a past and
present occurrence simply because one happened before the other. The example of
this from the story is “she broke up with her boyfriend” the stress and
negative emotions that came forth after her breakup were considered the cause
for the appearance of the poltergeist.
Hasty
Generalization- “The thing seems to dislike horses” The hasty generalization
and reasoning behind the poltergeist being present is that it doesn’t like
horses. On two occurrences a horse figurine and a horse picture were both moved
thus generalizing that the poltergeist is targeting horses because it does not
like them.
T
x- Kronk
Appeal to emotion- “I could feel the
underlying tension and fear.” After the writer steps into the house, they make
note of the tension and fear that they could feel coming from the women in the
ropom. This was a good example of Emotional Appeal because it backs up the idea
that there is something bad in the house that is causing negative feelings and
emotions.
Slippery
Slope- (1) The dislike for horses and (2) the breakup with the boyfriend caused
the poltergeist to appear. There were two instances where slippery slope was
present within this story. The dislike for horses is what caused the
poltergeist, and the stress and emotion from the daughter after her breakup
also caused the poltergeist.
Appeal
to consequences- “Most poltergeist phenomena last only three weeks or so.” “You
mean this thing could leave of its own accord?” “Yes, and never come back.” The
example of this from the story is a conversation between the owner of the house
and the author where the author states a poltergeist only stays around for 3 weeks.
The appeal to consequence was the strongest persuasive argument here because believing
in the poltergeist would mean that it would leave within three weeks. Where not
believing that it was a poltergeist would mean that they were stuck in a worst-case
scenario situation.
No comments:
Post a Comment