INTRO
Attention Getter:
My sister told me when I was younger that she saw Bigfoot, and that it was the
most terrifying, humongous, hairiest beast she ever saw. She asked if I wanted
to see it too, and I said yes, of course, so she hurried me to the other side
of the house, pointing in the direction I was to look and all I saw was a mirror
reflection of myself. Sisters are mean.
Thesis: Though my sister and I were young at that time, the
author of this article is 67 and could be going delusional, but this article seems
credible because she vividly describes what she saw and heard and uses her
experience as an RN and former pilot to support her credibility as well as uses exact numbers which are often associated with facts.
Credibility: I’m
Rachel and apparently I’m Bigfoot so I must know a thing or two about this
topic.
Preview: Fallacies
and P-OT
References:
Vrooman’s fallacy chart and Perelmen’s argument chart
MAIN POINT (3): Including
3 Fallacies
TRANSITION: Next,
we’re going to look at arguments using Perelmen’s chart
MAIN POINT (3): P-OT
CONCLUSION:
Summary: In
conclusion, we talked about how these fallacies enhanced this article and can
be seen as credible because it is able to use data, and describe what is
happening.
Clencher: Plus, I
would know that bigfoot is real since I’m here now. Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment