Video:
Black Lives Matter vs. All Lives Matter Supporters (social
Experiment)
|
Rhetorical Devices
Meiosis: Diminishing the importance of something by using
a disproportionate name
|
Quote:
There were two sides where the Black Lives Matter sign was
used and then a All Lives Matter sign was used. Both of these signs got
different reactions one of showing really no care for it and then the other
being enraged by it.
|
Analysis: It showed that by changing just one word on a
sign could push people to the edge where African Americans were chasing after
the man because he had a All Lives Matter sign, while with the Black Lives
Matter sign there was really no emotion or real movement to speak on the
movement.
|
Author/creator: Joey Salads
|
Fallacies:
Emotional Appeal:
Something is true because it makes us feel good or untrue
because it doesn’t
|
Quote:
The emotions of both signs differ, one showing no emotion
accusing the Black Lives Matter movement as being fake and then the All Lives
Matter movement which angered African Americans which saw it as wrong and
discrediting the Black Lives Matter movement.
|
Analysis: Emotions ran deep depending on how the
individual felt with what the movement stood for which both sides saw this
movements as being a fake and that they should represent the exact opposite.
|
Perelman Arguments:
Incompatibility:
Apparent incompatibility of propositions
|
Quote: The signs are incapable of capturing what the two
sides were arguing for in the social experiment, one wanting more for Black
Lives and then the other wanted to represent All Lives matter.
|
Analysis: The propositions made by these signs are
incompatible with the mindsets of the two control groups within this
experiment but if he was to switch the signs the groups would agree
completely.
|
Press: The New Yorker, The Matter of Black Lives
|
Rhetorical Devices
Epitrope: A pretend concession
|
Quotes:
“She posted a statement online in which she said that she
“could not, with any integrity, participate in such a sham that would only
serve to legitimize the false narrative that the government is working to end
police brutality and the institutional racism that fuels it.”
|
Analysis:
Aislinn Pulley a community organizer helps state why this
movement is so different from the earlier civil rights movements, showing
that they stray from hierarchy and centralized leadership making it difficult
for everyone to be on the same page and hold the same values but also allows
for other ideas of equality and rights to be shared in a more individual
especially through one’s opinions and views.
|
Author/creator: Jelani Cobb
|
Fallacies:
Appeal to misleading authority (w/Appeal to Celebrity
& Appeal to tradition):
Using an authority to affirm a conclusion when the
authority is not expert enough, in the context, to assure the conclusion
|
Quote:
“while Black Lives Matter’s insistent outsider status has
allowed it to shape the dialogue surrounding race and criminal justice in
this country, it has also sparked a debate about the limits of protest,
particularly of online activism.
|
Analysis:
The movement as a whole is trying to gain authority in the
sphere of civil rights but due to the ever changing ideas and members
especially on social media it makes it difficult to understand where the
movement is going and how much authority they have in tackling civil rights
issues.
|
Perelman Arguments:
Philosophical: Reduction of definition to facts
|
Quotes:
“#BlackLivesMatter. Garza sometimes writes haiku—she
admires the economy of the form—and in those four syllables she recognized a
distillation not only of the anger that attended Zimmerman’s acquittal but
also of the animating principle at the core of black social movements dating
back more than a century.”
|
Analysis:
The hashtag is more than just four syllables now, it has
more meanings than anyone can imagine. Due to the use of social media this
hashtag has made it so difficult to define what the Black Lives Matter
movement is all about and it’s goals. The thing is you can put a true
definition to it but only think of what it could mean to you and apply it.
This hashtag helps explain the issue of the ever changing ideas of Black
Lives Matter.
|
Social Media: Copwatch
|
Rhetorical Devices:
Epizeuxis:
Repetition of one word
|
Quotes:
“Cops”
“NYPD”
“Police”
|
Analysis:
These words are used repeatedly in the majority of the
tweets putting a emphasis on the cops or the police being the reason for
whatever is talked about. Showing that these cops and police won’t stop so
they must be stopped.
|
Author/Creator:
@Copwatch
|
Fallacies:
Appeal to consequences:
A proposition is true because belief in it leads to good
things or it is untrue because that belief will lead to bad things
|
Quotes:
“The cops watch us. We get cameras to watch the cops.”
|
Analysis:
The idea that if cops are there to watch us and keep the
peace then who is watching the cops to make sure they are doing it for the
peace for all. They watch us so we should watch them, the idea is for it to
go full circle in the idea of equal justice.
|
Perelman Arguments:
Contagion:
Propagation where A is already bad
|
Quotes:
“Blood at the Roots.”
“#ShutItDown”
|
Analysis:
The idea of this page is built upon this showing that
police brutality has been happening for a long time and it is time for it to
stop and by bringing awareness to filming police it allows for people to have
some security in protecting themselves against this ever present danger.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment